Press Releases

Budapest, November 2, 2010 08:30

Magyar Telekom informs its shareholders of recent developments in its lawsuits.

As previously disclosed in May 2010, two Hungarian minority shareholders filed a lawsuit against the Company, requesting the Metropolitan Court to render ineffective the resolutions passed by the general meeting on April 7, 2010. The Metropolitan Court suspended the implementation of shareholders' resolutions regarding the resolutions adopted by the April 25, 2008 Annual General Meeting of the Company that had been rendered ineffective by the Metropolitan Court in a judgment dated May 13, 2009. As a result of the Metropolitan Court's order announced on October 29, 2010, the suspension of the implementation of these resolutions has terminated. On October 29, 2010, the Metropolitan Court also announced its first instance judgment rejecting the minority shareholders' claim.

As previously disclosed in May 2010, another minority shareholder filed a lawsuit against the Company, requesting the Metropolitan Court to render ineffective certain shareholders' resolutions passed by the general meeting on April 7, 2010. The Metropolitan Court, in its first instance order announced on October 29, 2010, terminated the lawsuit, as the minority shareholder had withdrawn its claim.

Since the above mentioned first instance judgment and order terminating the lawsuit are not final and binding (they may be appealed), we cannot fully exclude that the Company will be required to take other corporate actions in connection with the above shareholders' suits. Also, we cannot provide any assurance that this matter will not have other adverse effects on the Company that are not currently foreseen.

As previously disclosed in May 2008, a lawsuit was launched against the Company as a result of the termination by the Company of its agreements for the operation of the Company's call centers. The plaintiffs to this lawsuit include companies in which the two minority shareholders party to the lawsuit described in the first paragraph above have business interests. On October 28, 2010, the Metropolitan Court held in its first instance interim judgment that, among other things, the Company is liable in connection with the termination of the agreements, while it rendered no decision as to the amount of the claim. The Company believes that the claim is unfounded, and the Company intends to appeal the interim judgment. If, despite the appeal, the decision on the Company's liability becomes final and binding, the lawsuit may continue as to the amount of the claim.